Absolute densities in exoplanetary systems: photodynamical modelling of Kepler-138
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Study focuses on determining density of transiting planets in multiple systems using photometry data alone
- Photodynamical model used to simulate individual photometric observations and analyze Kepler-138 planetary system
- Approach provides more precise results compared to previous determinations
- Discrepancy found in stellar bulk density compared to previous study, leading to inconsistencies in determination of masses and radii for star and planets
- Kepler-138b identified as having a size between Mars and Earth
- Generalized Bayesian inference model used to further characterize planetary interiors and quantify interior degeneracy
- Analysis reveals significantly thick volatile layers for both Kepler-138b and Kepler-138d, with gas layer of Kepler-138b likely enriched
- Kepler-138c appears to be predominantly rocky
- Study demonstrates how photodynamical modeling can provide valuable insights into exoplanetary systems' densities and interior compositions
- Contributes to understanding of planetary formation and evolution processes in multiple systems like Kepler 138 by allowing better characterization of interiors with greater precision than before
Authors: J. M. Almenara, R. F. Díaz, C. Dorn, X. Bonfils, S. Udry
Abstract: In favourable conditions, the density of transiting planets in multiple systems can be determined from photometry data alone. Dynamical information can be extracted from light curves, providing modelling is done self-consistently, i.e. using a photodynamical model, which simulates the individual photometric observations instead of the more generally used transit times. We apply this methodology to the Kepler-138 planetary system. The derived planetary bulk densities are a factor of 2 more precise than previous determinations, and we find a discrepancy in the stellar bulk density with respect to a previous study. This leads, in turn, to a discrepancy in the determination of masses and radii of the star and the planets. In particular, we find that interior planet, Kepler-138b, has a size in between Mars and the Earth. Given our mass and density estimates, we characterize the planetary interiors using a generalized Bayesian inference model. This model allows us to quantify for interior degeneracy and calculate confidence regions of interior parameters such as thicknesses of the core, the mantle, and ocean and gas layers. We find that Kepler-138b and Kepler-138d have significantly thick volatile layers and that the gas layer of Kepler-138b is likely enriched. On the other hand, Kepler-138c can be purely rocky.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.