The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing Meaning through Word Embeddings

AI-generated keywords: Word Embeddings Neural-Network High-Dimensional Cultural Associations Coevolution

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors introduce neural-network word embedding models for large-scale text analysis
  • Word embeddings represent semantic relations between words as geometric relationships in high-dimensional space
  • Models offer richer insights into cultural associations and categories compared to previous methods
  • Dimensions induced by word differences in vector spaces closely correspond to dimensions of cultural meaning
  • Words projected onto these dimensions reflect widely shared cultural connotations
  • Various applications of word embeddings for macro-cultural investigation demonstrated, including coevolution of gender and class associations in the United States over the 20th century
  • Comparative analysis of historic distinctions between markers of gender and class in the U.S. and Britain conducted
  • High-dimensional models call for a shift towards "high-dimensional theorizing" regarding meanings, identities, and cultural processes
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Austin C. Kozlowski, Matt Taddy, James A. Evans

American Sociological Review 2019, Vol. 84(5) 905-949

Abstract: We demonstrate the utility of a new methodological tool, neural-network word embedding models, for large-scale text analysis, revealing how these models produce richer insights into cultural associations and categories than possible with prior methods. Word embeddings represent semantic relations between words as geometric relationships between vectors in a high-dimensional space, operationalizing a relational model of meaning consistent with contemporary theories of identity and culture. We show that dimensions induced by word differences (e.g. man - woman, rich - poor, black - white, liberal - conservative) in these vector spaces closely correspond to dimensions of cultural meaning, and the projection of words onto these dimensions reflects widely shared cultural connotations when compared to surveyed responses and labeled historical data. We pilot a method for testing the stability of these associations, then demonstrate applications of word embeddings for macro-cultural investigation with a longitudinal analysis of the coevolution of gender and class associations in the United States over the 20th century and a comparative analysis of historic distinctions between markers of gender and class in the U.S. and Britain. We argue that the success of these high-dimensional models motivates a move towards "high-dimensional theorizing" of meanings, identities and cultural processes.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Mar. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1803.09288v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing Meaning through Word Embeddings," authors Austin C. Kozlowski, Matt Taddy, and James A. Evans introduce a new methodological tool called neural-network word embedding models for large-scale text analysis. They demonstrate how these models offer richer insights into cultural associations and categories compared to previous methods. Word embeddings are representations of semantic relations between words as geometric relationships between vectors in a high-dimensional space. This approach operationalizes a relational model of meaning that aligns with contemporary theories of identity and culture. The authors show that the dimensions induced by word differences in these vector spaces closely correspond to dimensions of cultural meaning. By projecting words onto these dimensions, the authors find that they reflect widely shared cultural connotations when compared to surveyed responses and labeled historical data. To test the stability of these associations, they pilot a method and then proceed to demonstrate various applications of word embeddings for macro-cultural investigation. One such application includes a longitudinal analysis of the coevolution of gender and class associations in the United States over the 20th century. Additionally, the authors conduct a comparative analysis of historic distinctions between markers of gender and class in the U.S. and Britain. Based on their findings, the authors argue that the success of these high-dimensional models calls for a shift towards "high-dimensional theorizing" regarding meanings, identities, and cultural processes. Overall, this paper highlights how neural-network word embedding models provide valuable insights into cultural associations and categories by representing semantic relations between words as geometric relationships in high-dimensional spaces. The applications showcased in this study shed light on the coevolution of gender and class associations while emphasizing the need for more comprehensive approaches to understanding meanings, identities, and cultural processes.
Created on 09 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.