Convolutional Neural Networks and Language Embeddings for End-to-End Dialect Recognition
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper addresses the problem of dialect identification (DID) within language identification (LID)
- Proposes an end-to-end DID system using a Siamese neural network to extract language embeddings
- Focuses on the Arabic dialectal speech dataset called MGB-3 and uses acoustic and linguistic features
- Trains the system using three types of acoustic features: MFCCs, FBANK, and spectrogram energies
- Investigates dataset augmentation approach to enhance performance with limited data resources
- Explores similarities and dissimilarities between dialects using the Siamese network for feature dimensionality reduction
- Achieves 73% accuracy with a single feature set and 78% accuracy with a fusion system combining multiple features on the MGB-3 test set
- FBANK features perform slightly better than MFCCs
- Dataset augmentation through speed perturbation enhances system robustness
- Combining Siamese network with language embeddings in a fused system shows promising synergy
Authors: Suwon Shon, Ahmed Ali, James Glass
Abstract: Dialect identification (DID) is a special case of general language identification (LID), but a more challenging problem due to the linguistic similarity between dialects. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end DID system and a Siamese neural network to extract language embeddings. We use both acoustic and linguistic features for the DID task on the Arabic dialectal speech dataset: Multi-Genre Broadcast 3 (MGB-3). The end-to-end DID system was trained using three kinds of acoustic features: Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), log Mel-scale Filter Bank energies (FBANK) and spectrogram energies. We also investigated a dataset augmentation approach to achieve robust performance with limited data resources. Our linguistic feature research focused on learning similarities and dissimilarities between dialects using the Siamese network, so that we can reduce feature dimensionality as well as improve DID performance. The best system using a single feature set achieves 73% accuracy, while a fusion system using multiple features yields 78% on the MGB-3 dialect test set consisting of 5 dialects. The experimental results indicate that FBANK features achieve slightly better results than MFCCs. Dataset augmentation via speed perturbation appears to add significant robustness to the system. Although the Siamese network with language embeddings did not achieve as good a result as the end-to-end DID system, the two approaches had good synergy when combined together in a fused system.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.