Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1803.01442v1

Neural networks have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial examples, where carefully crafted perturbations of real images can lead to misclassification and undermine the reliability of deep learning systems. To address this issue, the authors draw inspiration from game theory and frame the problem as a minimax zero-sum game between the adversary and the model. They propose a mixed strategy called Stochastic Activation Pruning (SAP) for robust adversarial defense. SAP involves randomly pruning a subset of activations with preference for those with smaller magnitudes while scaling up the remaining activations to compensate. The advantage of SAP is that it can be applied to pretrained networks including adversarially trained models without requiring fine-tuning. Experimental results demonstrate that SAP improves robustness against attacks by enhancing accuracy and preserving calibration. This approach provides an effective defense mechanism against adversarial examples in deep learning systems.

• - Neural networks vulnerable to adversarial examples
• - Adversarial examples undermine reliability of deep learning systems
• - Problem framed as minimax zero-sum game between adversary and model
• - Proposed solution: Stochastic Activation Pruning (SAP)
• - SAP involves randomly pruning subset of activations with preference for smaller magnitudes, scaling up remaining activations
• - SAP can be applied to pretrained networks without fine-tuning
• - Experimental results show SAP improves robustness against attacks, enhances accuracy, preserves calibration
• - SAP provides effective defense mechanism against adversarial examples in deep learning systems

Neural networks are like brains that can learn and make decisions. But sometimes, bad people can trick them by showing them fake examples. This makes the networks not work well and we cannot trust their decisions anymore. To solve this problem, we can play a game with the bad people where we try to protect the network from being tricked. One way to do this is by randomly removing some parts of the network and making the remaining parts stronger. This helps the network become more resistant to tricks without needing to change it too much. When we tried this method, it made the network better at making good decisions and also kept its accuracy and reliability. So now we have a good way to defend against tricks in neural networks." Definitions- Neural networks: Like brains that can learn and make decisions. - Adversarial examples: Fake examples that trick neural networks. - Deep learning systems: Networks that use many layers to make decisions. - Stochastic Activation Pruning (SAP): A method of randomly removing parts of a network to make it stronger. - Robustness: The ability to resist being tricked or attacked. - Calibration: The accuracy and reliability of a network's decisions.

Stochastic Activation Pruning: A New Defense Against Adversarial Examples in Deep Learning Systems

Deep learning systems have become increasingly popular for a variety of applications, ranging from computer vision to natural language processing. However, these systems are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which are carefully crafted perturbations of real images that can lead to misclassification and undermine the reliability of deep learning models. To address this issue, researchers have proposed various defense mechanisms such as adversarial training and input transformations. In this paper, the authors draw inspiration from game theory and frame the problem as a minimax zero-sum game between the adversary and the model. They propose a mixed strategy called Stochastic Activation Pruning (SAP) for robust adversarial defense. SAP involves randomly pruning a subset of activations with preference for those with smaller magnitudes while scaling up the remaining activations to compensate. The advantage of SAP is that it can be applied to pretrained networks including adversarially trained models without requiring fine-tuning.

How Does SAP Work?

The authors propose an algorithm based on stochastic activation pruning (SAP) that randomly prunes activations in neural networks while preserving accuracy and calibration against attacks by adversaries. In particular, they use a Bernoulli distribution over each activation vector xi where p(xi=0)=p is set according to some predefined probability distribution p(x). For each layer l in the network, they then scale up all nonzero activations by 1/p so that their sum remains constant across layers despite random pruning at each layer l. This ensures that no information is lost due to pruning while also making it difficult for an adversary to craft targeted perturbations since there will be fewer active neurons available at any given time step during inference or training phase.

Experimental Results

The authors conducted experiments on several benchmark datasets including CIFAR-10 and ImageNet using different types of attack algorithms such as PGD, FGSM and CW attacks with varying levels of strength (epsilon). They found that SAP was able to improve robustness against these attacks by enhancing accuracy and preserving calibration compared with other methods such as input transformation techniques like JPEG compression or bit depth reduction or ensemble methods like Randomized Smoothing or Adversarial Training (AT). Furthermore, they showed that even when combined with AT methods like TRADES or MADRYL which already provide strong defenses against adversaries’ attack strategies; SAP still provides additional robustness gains in terms of both accuracy and calibration metrics across all datasets tested here.

Conclusion

To conclude, this paper presents Stochastic Activation Pruning (SAP), a novel approach for defending deep learning systems against adversarial examples through random pruning of activations within neural networks while preserving accuracy and calibration metrics across different benchmark datasets tested here including CIFAR-10 & ImageNet under various attack algorithms such as PGD & FGSM etc.. Experimental results demonstrate its effectiveness compared with other existing defense mechanisms such as input transformation techniques & ensemble methods like Randomized Smoothing & Adversarial Training respectively providing strong evidence towards its potential utility in practical scenarios where reliable predictions are essential despite presence of malicious actors attempting targeted perturbations on inputs fed into deep learning models deployed in production environments