Profitability of simple stationary technical trading rules with high-frequency data of Chinese Index Futures

AI-generated keywords: Technical trading rules profitability high-frequency data stationarity transaction costs

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Jing-Chao Chen, Yu Zhou, and Xi Wang study the profitability of technical trading rules in financial markets.
  • The authors convert Moving Average (MA), KDJ, and Bollinger Bands into stationary processes for analysis.
  • High-frequency data (15s, 30s, and 60s intervals) from the CSI300 Stock Index Futures is used for the study.
  • Various performance and risk measures are employed to evaluate the practical value of these trading rules.
  • An Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test is used to verify stationarity, while a Superior Predictive Ability (SPA) test determines success factors.
  • Significant parameter combinations are found for each indicator without transaction costs; however, profits disappear once transaction costs are considered.
  • The study suggests a method to mitigate risks associated with technical trading rules.
  • Stationarity and transaction costs play crucial roles in evaluating the profitability of technical trading strategies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jing-Chao Chen, Yu Zhou, Xi Wang

arXiv: 1710.07470v1 - DOI (q-fin.ST)
24 pages,11 figures, 19 tables

Abstract: Technical trading rules have been widely used by practitioners in financial markets for a long time. The profitability remains controversial and few consider the stationarity of technical indicators used in trading rules. We convert MA, KDJ and Bollinger bands into stationary processes and investigate the profitability of these trading rules by using 3 high-frequency data(15s,30s and 60s) of CSI300 Stock Index Futures from January 4th 2012 to December 31st 2016. Several performance and risk measures are adopted to assess the practical value of all trading rules directly while ADF-test is used to verify the stationarity and SPA test to check whether trading rules perform well due to intrinsic superiority or pure luck. The results show that there are several significant combinations of parameters for each indicator when transaction costs are not taken into consideration. Once transaction costs are included, trading profits will be eliminated completely. We also propose a method to reduce the risk of technical trading rules.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Oct. 2017

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1710.07470v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study titled "Profitability of Simple Stationary Technical Trading Rules with High-Frequency Data of Chinese Index Futures," authors Jing-Chao Chen, Yu Zhou, and Xi Wang delve into the controversial realm of technical trading rules in financial markets. The profitability of such rules has long been debated, with little consideration given to the stationarity of the technical indicators used. To address this gap, the authors convert Moving Average (MA), KDJ, and Bollinger Bands into stationary processes and analyze their profitability using high-frequency data (15s, 30s, and 60s intervals) from the CSI300 Stock Index Futures spanning from January 4th, 2012 to December 31st, 2016. The research employs various performance and risk measures to evaluate the practical value of these trading rules directly. Additionally, an Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test is utilized to verify stationarity while a Superior Predictive Ability (SPA) test is conducted to determine whether the success of trading rules is attributed to inherent superiority or mere luck. The findings reveal several significant parameter combinations for each indicator when transaction costs are not factored in. However, once transaction costs are considered, any potential trading profits are completely eradicated. Furthermore, the study proposes a method to mitigate the risks associated with technical trading rules. Overall,this research sheds light on the complexities surrounding technical trading strategies in financial markets and underscores the importance of considering stationarity and transaction costs in evaluating their profitability.
Created on 18 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.