Microservice Architectures (MA) have gained popularity in software development due to their potential to increase agility. In the context of evolving software requirements, particularly for Internet of Things (IoT) applications, the issue of microservice granularity and its impact on application latency is examined. This study explores two approaches to microservice deployment: one with microservices in a single container and another with microservices partitioned across separate containers. The research findings indicate that there is only a negligible increase in service latency when using multiple containers for microservice deployment compared to a single container. This suggests that partitioning microservices across separate containers does not significantly affect application performance. The authors, Dharmendra Shadija, Mo Rezai, and Richard Hill, emphasize the importance of considering microservice granularity in order to achieve efficient software development and support emerging requirements. The study provides valuable insights for businesses looking to adopt Microservice Architectures and highlights the potential benefits of this approach in supporting evolving software needs, particularly for IoT applications.
- - Microservice Architectures (MA) increase agility in software development
- - Microservice granularity and its impact on application latency are examined
- - Two approaches to microservice deployment: single container vs separate containers
- - Negligible increase in service latency when using multiple containers
- - Partitioning microservices across separate containers does not significantly affect application performance
- - Importance of considering microservice granularity for efficient software development
- - Valuable insights for businesses looking to adopt Microservice Architectures
- - Potential benefits of MA in supporting evolving software needs, particularly for IoT applications
Summary
Microservice Architectures (MA) make software development faster and more flexible. We can look at how small or big each microservice is and how it affects the time it takes for an application to work. There are two ways to use microservices: putting them all in one container or separating them into different containers. It doesn't make a big difference in how long it takes for the services to work when we use separate containers. Splitting microservices into different containers doesn't really affect how well the application works. It's important to think about how big or small each microservice should be when we want to develop software efficiently. Businesses can learn a lot from these ideas if they want to use Microservice Architectures, especially for things like Internet of Things applications.
Definitions- Microservice Architectures (MA): A way of developing software that uses small, independent parts called microservices.
- Agility: The ability to move quickly and easily.
- Granularity: How big or small something is divided into smaller parts.
- Latency: The time it takes for something to happen, like how long it takes for an application to work.
- Deployment: How something is set up or put into action.
- Negligible: So small that it doesn't really matter.
- Partitioning: Dividing something into separate parts.
- Performance: How well something works or performs its job.
- Efficiently: Doing something in a way that saves time and effort.
- IoT applications: Applications
Microservice Architectures (MA) have become increasingly popular in software development due to their potential to increase agility and support evolving software requirements. In today's fast-paced technological landscape, businesses are constantly faced with the challenge of adapting to changing customer needs and market demands. This has led to a growing interest in microservices as a means of achieving greater flexibility and scalability in software development.
In this context, the research paper "Impact of Microservice Granularity on Application Latency for Internet of Things Applications" by Dharmendra Shadija, Mo Rezai, and Richard Hill explores the issue of microservice granularity and its impact on application latency. The study focuses specifically on IoT applications, which are characterized by large volumes of data and real-time processing requirements.
The authors begin by providing an overview of Microservice Architectures and their key characteristics. They highlight how MA differs from traditional monolithic architectures by breaking down applications into smaller, independent services that can be developed, deployed, and managed separately. This allows for greater flexibility in terms of technology choices, deployment options, and scalability.
One important aspect addressed in this study is the deployment strategy for microservices – whether they should be placed within a single container or partitioned across multiple containers. To investigate this issue, the authors conducted experiments using two different approaches: one with all microservices deployed within a single container (monolithic approach) and another with each microservice placed in its own container (partitioned approach).
The results showed that there was only a negligible difference in service latency between the two approaches. This suggests that partitioning microservices across separate containers does not significantly affect application performance. The authors also note that while there may be some overhead associated with managing multiple containers compared to a single one, it is minimal when considering the potential benefits offered by MA.
Furthermore, the study highlights how granular microservices can support emerging requirements such as those found in IoT applications. With the increasing use of IoT devices and the resulting explosion of data, traditional monolithic architectures may struggle to handle the volume and real-time processing demands. In contrast, microservices offer a more efficient and scalable solution for handling these requirements.
The authors also emphasize the importance of considering microservice granularity in order to achieve efficient software development. By breaking down applications into smaller services, developers can focus on specific functionalities and make changes or updates without affecting the entire system. This allows for faster development cycles and easier maintenance.
In conclusion, this research paper provides valuable insights for businesses looking to adopt Microservice Architectures. It highlights how partitioning microservices across separate containers does not significantly impact application performance, making it a viable option for supporting evolving software needs. The study also emphasizes the potential benefits of MA in addressing emerging requirements, particularly for IoT applications. As technology continues to evolve at a rapid pace, Microservice Architectures offer a promising approach for achieving agility and scalability in software development.