Robust Monitoring of Time Series with Application to Fraud Detection

AI-generated keywords: Robust Monitoring

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors address challenges posed by outliers, level shifts, and structural changes in time series data
  • Proposed unified framework for detecting outliers and level shifts in short time series with a seasonal pattern
  • Introduction of the double wedge plot as a graphical representation to highlight outliers and potential level shifts
  • Tailored methodology for identifying potential fraud cases within time series data related to imports into the European Union
  • Research demonstrates effectiveness through illustrations based on specific import series
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Peter J. Rousseeuw, Domenico Perrotta, Marco Riani, Mia Hubert

Econometrics and Statistics, 2019, Vol. 9, 108-121

Abstract: Time series often contain outliers and level shifts or structural changes. These unexpected events are of the utmost importance in fraud detection, as they may pinpoint suspicious transactions. The presence of such unusual events can easily mislead conventional time series analysis and yield erroneous conclusions. In this paper we provide a unified framework for detecting outliers and level shifts in short time series that may have a seasonal pattern. The approach combines ideas from the FastLTS algorithm for robust regression with alternating least squares. The double wedge plot is proposed, a graphical display which indicates outliers and potential level shifts. The methodology was developed to detect potential fraud cases in time series of imports into the European Union, and is illustrated on two such series.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Aug. 2017

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1708.08268v4

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In their paper titled "Robust Monitoring of Time Series with Application to Fraud Detection," authors Peter J. Rousseeuw, Domenico Perrotta, Marco Riani, and Mia Hubert address the challenges posed by outliers, level shifts, and structural changes in time series data. These unexpected events are particularly crucial in fraud detection scenarios as they can indicate potentially suspicious transactions. Conventional time series analysis methods may be inadequate in handling such unusual occurrences, leading to erroneous conclusions. To tackle this issue, the authors propose a unified framework for detecting outliers and level shifts specifically in short time series that exhibit a seasonal pattern. Their approach combines concepts from the FastLTS algorithm for robust regression with alternating least squares. A key contribution of their work is the introduction of the double wedge plot, a graphical representation that highlights outliers and potential level shifts within the data. The methodology developed by the authors was tailored towards identifying potential fraud cases within time series data related to imports into the European Union. To demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach, they provide illustrations based on two specific import series. This research not only contributes to enhancing fraud detection techniques but also showcases the importance of robust statistical methods in handling complex time series data with unexpected events. The findings presented in this paper offer valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working in fields such as finance, economics, and cybersecurity where accurate detection of anomalies is paramount.
Created on 15 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.