Enterprise to Computer: Star Trek chatbot
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper explores the impact of style on human interactions and human-computer interactions
- The authors propose a chatbot called Enterprise to Computer bot (E2Cbot) that captures the unique "style" of Star Trek
- E2Cbot utilizes two different recurrent neural network Encoder-Decoder models: one trained on Star Trek dialogs and another known as Word Graph
- Objective measures such as perplexity and word overlap with Star Trek vocabulary are used to evaluate the effectiveness of the chatbot
- Subjective feedback from human evaluators is also considered
- Incorporating a persona into a chatbot enhances its human-like qualities and improves user engagement
- E2Cbot offers an immersive user experience for fans of Star Trek while maintaining general conversational capabilities.
Authors: Grishma Jena, Mansi Vashisht, Abheek Basu, Lyle Ungar, João Sedoc
Abstract: Human interactions and human-computer interactions are strongly influenced by style as well as content. Adding a persona to a chatbot makes it more human-like and contributes to a better and more engaging user experience. In this work, we propose a design for a chatbot that captures the "style" of Star Trek by incorporating references from the show along with peculiar tones of the fictional characters therein. Our Enterprise to Computer bot (E2Cbot) treats Star Trek dialog style and general dialog style differently, using two recurrent neural network Encoder-Decoder models. The Star Trek dialog style uses sequence to sequence (SEQ2SEQ) models (Sutskever et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2014) trained on Star Trek dialogs. The general dialog style uses Word Graph to shift the response of the SEQ2SEQ model into the Star Trek domain. We evaluate the bot both in terms of perplexity and word overlap with Star Trek vocabulary and subjectively using human evaluators.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.