Dependence of optimal wind turbine spacing on wind farm length

Authors: Richard J. A. M. Stevens

Wind Energy, 19: 651-663 (2016)
arXiv: 1707.01808v1 - DOI (physics.flu-dyn)
13 pages, 9 figures

Abstract: Recent large eddy simulations have led to improved parameterizations of the effective roughness height of wind farms. This effective roughness height can be used to predict the wind velocity at hub-height as function of the geometric mean of the spanwise and streamwise turbine spacings and the turbine loading factors. Meyers and Meneveau (Wind Energy 15, 305-317 (2012)) used these parameterizations to make predictions for the optimal wind turbine spacing in infinitely large wind farms. They found that for a realistic cost ratio between the turbines and the used land surface the optimal turbine spacing may be considerably larger than used in conventional wind farms. Here we extend this analysis by taking the length of the wind farm, i.e.\ the number of rows in the downstream direction, into account and show that the optimal turbine spacing strongly depends on the wind farm length. For small to moderately sized wind farms the model predictions are consistent with spacings found in operational wind farms. For much larger wind farms the extended optimal spacing found for infinite wind farms is confirmed.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jul. 2017

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1707.01808v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 15 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.