Blue Sky Ideas in Artificial Intelligence Education from the EAAI 2017 New and Future AI Educator Program

AI-generated keywords: EAAI'17 AI education ethics interdisciplinary collaborations early-career educators

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The EAAI'17 Symposium launched the EAAI New and Future AI Educator Program
  • The program supports early-career university faculty, secondary school faculty, and future educators pursuing academia
  • Awardees addressed "blue sky" questions on incorporating ethics into AI courses, teaching AI at an early level, and promoting interdisciplinary education
  • Eric Eaton and Sven Koenig are among the awardees who provided responses
  • Ethical considerations in AI courses should be addressed, with case studies used to understand their implications
  • Interactive activities can be used to teach AI at an early level
  • Existing resources should be leveraged for accessibility in AI education
  • Courses should be designed with applications of AI in various fields to promote interdisciplinary collaborations
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Eric Eaton, Sven Koenig, Claudia Schulz, Francesco Maurelli, John Lee, Joshua Eckroth, Mark Crowley, Richard G. Freedman, Rogelio E. Cardona-Rivera, Tiago Machado, Tom Williams

AI Matters 3(4):23-31, Winter 2018
Working paper in the 7th Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI-17)

Abstract: The 7th Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI'17, co-chaired by Sven Koenig and Eric Eaton) launched the EAAI New and Future AI Educator Program to support the training of early-career university faculty, secondary school faculty, and future educators (PhD candidates or postdocs who intend a career in academia). As part of the program, awardees were asked to address one of the following "blue sky" questions: * How could/should Artificial Intelligence (AI) courses incorporate ethics into the curriculum? * How could we teach AI topics at an early undergraduate or a secondary school level? * AI has the potential for broad impact to numerous disciplines. How could we make AI education more interdisciplinary, specifically to benefit non-engineering fields? This paper is a collection of their responses, intended to help motivate discussion around these issues in AI education.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Feb. 2017

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1702.00137v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The 7th Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI'17) launched the EAAI New and Future AI Educator Program to support early-career university faculty, secondary school faculty, and future educators pursuing academia. Awardees addressed "blue sky" questions on incorporating ethics into AI courses, teaching AI at an early level, and promoting interdisciplinary education. This paper presents responses from awardees like Eric Eaton and Sven Koenig to stimulate discussions on these issues. The authors stress the importance of addressing ethical considerations in AI courses and using case studies to understand their implications. They suggest interactive activities for teaching AI at an early level and leveraging existing resources for accessibility. To promote interdisciplinary collaborations, they recommend designing courses with applications of AI in various fields. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights for improving inclusive and impactful AI education.
Created on 15 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.