Tripartite entanglement of fermionic system in accelerated frames

AI-generated keywords: Tripartite entanglement Fermionic system Accelerated frames Noninertial frames Quantum information processing

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study by Salman Khan on tripartite entanglement in accelerated frames
  • Entanglement measurement changes with acceleration of observers
  • One observer accelerated: Measurement not invariant with partial realignment
  • Two observers accelerated: Measurement remains invariant
  • Acceleration does not generate entanglement in bipartite subsystems
  • Genuine tripartite entanglement persists as acceleration approaches infinity
  • Degradation of tripartite entanglement faster with two accelerated observers than one
  • Tripartite entanglement more robust for quantum information processing in noninertial frames than bipartite entanglement
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Salman Khan

Annals of Physics 348, 270 (2014)
arXiv: 1612.02600v1 - DOI (quant-ph)
12 pages, 2 figures

Abstract: The dynamics of tripartite entanglement of fermionic system in noninertial frames through linear contraction criterion when one or two observers are accelerated is investigated. In one observer accelerated case the entanglement measurement is not invariant with respect to the partial realignment of different subsystems and for two observers accelerated case it is invariant. It is shown that the acceleration of the frame does not generate entanglement in any bipartite subsystems. Unlike the bipartite states, the genuine tripartite entanglement does not completely vanish in both one observer accelerated and two observers accelerated cases even in the limit of infinite acceleration. The degradation of tripartite entanglement is fast when two observers are accelerated than when one observer is accelerated. It is shown that tripartite entanglement is a better resource for quantum information processing than the bipartite entanglement in noninertial frames .

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Dec. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1612.02600v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study titled "Tripartite Entanglement of Fermionic System in Accelerated Frames" by Salman Khan explores the dynamics of tripartite entanglement in noninertial frames. The research investigates how the measurement of entanglement changes when one or two observers are accelerated. It is found that in the case of one observer being accelerated, the entanglement measurement is not invariant with respect to partial realignment of subsystems. However, for two observers being accelerated, it remains invariant. Additionally, the study reveals that acceleration does not generate entanglement in bipartite subsystems but genuine tripartite entanglement persists even as acceleration approaches infinity. Notably, degradation of tripartite entanglement occurs more rapidly when two observers are accelerated compared to only one observer. These findings suggest that tripartite entanglement serves as a more robust resource for quantum information processing than bipartite entanglement in noninertial frames. This research sheds light on the intricate dynamics of quantum entanglement and highlights the importance of considering multipartite states for future quantum technologies and applications.
Created on 13 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.