Population growth, interest rate, and housing tax in the transitional China

AI-generated keywords: Population growth

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Ling-Yun He and Xing-Chun Wen analyze the impact of interest rate and population growth shocks on housing prices.
  • They investigate the effectiveness of implementing housing taxes (stock or flow) to mitigate fluctuations in housing prices resulting from these shocks.
  • Findings suggest that the impact of housing tax tools depends on the specific shock affecting the housing market.
  • For volatility driven by population growth shocks, a flow tax can reduce volatility, while a stock tax has no significant impact.
  • When shocks stem from changes in interest rates, it is recommended not to impose any form of housing taxes.
  • Combining different types of housing taxes could potentially enhance their individual effects in stabilizing housing price fluctuations.
  • The research provides valuable insights for policymakers navigating complex dynamics within the real estate market during periods of economic transition.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ling-Yun He, Xing-Chun Wen

arXiv: 1610.07292v1 - DOI (q-fin.GN)

Abstract: This paper combines and develops the models in Lastrapes (2002) and Mankiw & Weil (1989), which enables us to analyze the effects of interest rate and population growth shocks on housing price in one integrated framework. Based on this model, we carry out policy simulations to examine whether the housing (stock or flow) tax reduces the housing price fluctuations caused by interest rate or population growth shocks. Simulation results imply that the choice of housing tax tools depends on the kind of shock that housing market faces. In the situation where the housing price volatility is caused by the population growth shock, the flow tax can reduce the volatility of housing price while the stock tax makes no difference to it. If the shock is resulting from the interest rate, the policy maker should not impose any kind of the housing taxes. Furthermore, the effect of one kind of the housing tax can be strengthened by that of the other type of housing tax.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Oct. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1610.07292v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Population growth, interest rate, and housing tax in the transitional China," authors Ling-Yun He and Xing-Chun Wen analyze the impact of interest rate and population growth shocks on housing prices within an integrated framework. They build upon existing models by Lastrapes (2002) and Mankiw & Weil (1989) to investigate whether implementing housing taxes (either stock or flow) can mitigate fluctuations in housing prices resulting from these shocks. The findings suggest that the effectiveness of housing tax tools depends on the specific shock affecting the housing market. In cases where volatility in housing prices is driven by population growth shocks, a flow tax can reduce this volatility, while a stock tax has no significant impact. However, when shocks stem from changes in interest rates, it is recommended to refrain from imposing any form of housing taxes. The authors also note that combining different types of housing taxes could potentially enhance their individual effects in stabilizing housing price fluctuations. This research provides valuable insights for policymakers navigating complex dynamics within the real estate market during periods of economic transition.
Created on 23 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.