Key-Value Memory Networks for Directly Reading Documents

AI-generated keywords: Key-Value Memory Networks

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors address the challenge of directly reading documents and answering questions
  • Traditional QA approaches rely on Knowledge Bases (KBs) but are restrictive and sparse
  • Introduce Key-Value Memory Networks as a new method to enhance document reading
  • Develop an analysis tool called WikiMovies to evaluate the effectiveness of Key-Value Memory Networks
  • Method reduces gap between using KBs or information extraction methods directly and achieves state-of-the-art results on WikiQA benchmark
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Alexander Miller, Adam Fisch, Jesse Dodge, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Antoine Bordes, Jason Weston

Abstract: Directly reading documents and being able to answer questions from them is an unsolved challenge. To avoid its inherent difficulty, question answering (QA) has been directed towards using Knowledge Bases (KBs) instead, which has proven effective. Unfortunately KBs often suffer from being too restrictive, as the schema cannot support certain types of answers, and too sparse, e.g. Wikipedia contains much more information than Freebase. In this work we introduce a new method, Key-Value Memory Networks, that makes reading documents more viable by utilizing different encodings in the addressing and output stages of the memory read operation. To compare using KBs, information extraction or Wikipedia documents directly in a single framework we construct an analysis tool, WikiMovies, a QA dataset that contains raw text alongside a preprocessed KB, in the domain of movies. Our method reduces the gap between all three settings. It also achieves state-of-the-art results on the existing WikiQA benchmark.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Jun. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1606.03126v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In their paper titled "Key-Value Memory Networks for Directly Reading Documents," authors Alexander Miller, Adam Fisch, Jesse Dodge, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Antoine Bordes, and Jason Weston address the challenge of directly reading documents and answering questions from them. Traditional question answering (QA) approaches have relied on Knowledge Bases (KBs), but these often prove too restrictive and sparse. To overcome these limitations, the authors introduce a new method called Key-Value Memory Networks. This approach enhances document reading by utilizing different encodings in the addressing and output stages of memory read operations. To evaluate the effectiveness of Key-Value Memory Networks compared to using KBs or information extraction methods directly, the authors develop an analysis tool called WikiMovies. This QA dataset contains raw text alongside a preprocessed KB in the domain of movies. Through their research, the authors demonstrate that their method reduces the gap between all three settings and achieves state-of-the-art results on the existing WikiQA benchmark. Overall, this study contributes to advancing QA systems by providing a more effective way to extract information from documents without relying solely on Knowledge Bases. The Key-Value Memory Networks approach shows promise in improving document reading capabilities and enhancing question answering processes in various domains such as movies.
Created on 16 Jul. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.