Profile-Driven Automated Mixed Precision

AI-generated keywords: Mixed Precision Automated Profiling Floating Point Variables Optimization

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper presents a scheme for automatically setting the precision of floating point variables in an application.
  • The authors propose a framework that profiles applications to measure undesirable numerical behavior at the floating point operation level.
  • Mixed precision analysis is used to heuristically set the precision of all variables based on their numerical profiles.
  • The authors experimentally evaluate the mixed precision analysis and demonstrate its ability to generate different results with varying accuracy and performance characteristics.
  • By dynamically adjusting the precision of floating point variables, this approach aims to optimize both accuracy and efficiency of computations.
  • The proposed framework provides a practical solution for optimizing both accuracy and performance in computational tasks involving floating point operations.
  • Overall, the paper introduces an automated method for determining appropriate precision for floating point variables to improve numerical behavior in applications.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ralph Nathan, Helia Naeimi, Daniel J. Sorin, Xiaobai Sun

Abstract: We present a scheme to automatically set the precision of floating point variables in an application. We design a framework that profiles applications to measure undesirable numerical behavior at the floating point operation level. We use this framework to perform mixed precision analysis to heuristically set the precision of all variables in an application based on their numerical profiles. We experimentally evaluate the mixed precision analysis to show that it can generate a range of results with different accuracy and performance characteristics.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jun. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1606.00251v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Profile-Driven Automated Mixed Precision" presents a scheme for automatically setting the precision of floating point variables in an application. The authors propose a framework that profiles applications to measure undesirable numerical behavior at the floating point operation level. This profiling is used to perform mixed precision analysis, which heuristically sets the precision of all variables in an application based on their numerical profiles. The authors experimentally evaluate the mixed precision analysis and demonstrate that it can generate a range of results with different accuracy and performance characteristics. By dynamically adjusting the precision of floating point variables, this approach aims to optimize both the accuracy and efficiency of computations. The proposed framework provides a practical solution for optimizing both accuracy and performance in computational tasks involving floating point operations. Overall, this paper introduces an automated method for determining the appropriate precision for floating point variables in order to improve numerical behavior in applications.
Created on 26 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.