Virtual Worlds as Proxy for Multi-Object Tracking Analysis

AI-generated keywords: Computer Vision Virtual Worlds Ground Truth Deep Learning Tracking

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Development of accurate computer vision algorithms often requires expensive data and manual labeling
  • Advancement in computer graphics allows for generating fully labeled virtual worlds that are dynamic and photo-realistic
  • Authors propose an efficient method for cloning real-world scenarios into virtual environments
  • Video dataset called Virtual KITTI is created, automatically labeled with ground truth information for various tasks
  • Quantitative experiments compare behavior of deep learning algorithms trained on real data vs virtual data
  • Algorithms exhibit similar performance in both real and virtual worlds, pre-training on virtual data can improve performance
  • Virtual worlds allow researchers to measure impact of weather conditions and imaging settings on recognition performance
  • Proxy virtual worlds can be effective substitutes for real-world data acquisition and labeling in computer vision research
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Adrien Gaidon, Qiao Wang, Yohann Cabon, Eleonora Vig

CVPR 2016, Virtual KITTI dataset download at http://www.xrce.xerox.com/Research-Development/Computer-Vision/Proxy-Virtual-Worlds

Abstract: Modern computer vision algorithms typically require expensive data acquisition and accurate manual labeling. In this work, we instead leverage the recent progress in computer graphics to generate fully labeled, dynamic, and photo-realistic proxy virtual worlds. We propose an efficient real-to-virtual world cloning method, and validate our approach by building and publicly releasing a new video dataset, called Virtual KITTI (see http://www.xrce.xerox.com/Research-Development/Computer-Vision/Proxy-Virtual-Worlds), automatically labeled with accurate ground truth for object detection, tracking, scene and instance segmentation, depth, and optical flow. We provide quantitative experimental evidence suggesting that (i) modern deep learning algorithms pre-trained on real data behave similarly in real and virtual worlds, and (ii) pre-training on virtual data improves performance. As the gap between real and virtual worlds is small, virtual worlds enable measuring the impact of various weather and imaging conditions on recognition performance, all other things being equal. We show these factors may affect drastically otherwise high-performing deep models for tracking.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 May. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1605.06457v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of computer vision, the development of accurate algorithms often relies on acquiring expensive data and manually labeling it. However, a recent advancement in computer graphics has opened up new possibilities for generating fully labeled virtual worlds that are dynamic and photo-realistic. In this study, the authors leverage this progress to propose an efficient method for cloning real-world scenarios into virtual environments. To validate their approach, the authors have created a video dataset called Virtual KITTI. This dataset is automatically labeled with ground truth information for various tasks such as object detection, tracking, scene segmentation, instance segmentation, depth estimation, and optical flow. By releasing this dataset to the public, they provide a valuable resource for researchers in the field. The authors also conduct quantitative experiments to compare the behavior of modern deep learning algorithms when trained on real data versus virtual data. They find that these algorithms exhibit similar performance in both real and virtual worlds. Furthermore, they observe that pre-training on virtual data can actually improve algorithm performance. One significant advantage of using virtual worlds is that they allow researchers to measure the impact of different weather conditions and imaging settings on recognition performance. By keeping all other factors equal, researchers can isolate the effects of these variables on deep models for tracking. Overall, this study demonstrates how proxy virtual worlds can serve as effective substitutes for real-world data acquisition and labeling in computer vision research. The findings suggest that pre-training on virtual data can enhance algorithm performance and highlight the importance of considering environmental factors when developing tracking models.
Created on 05 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.