Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1511.05858v1

In the study "Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data" by Hyewon Jang, the gaps between Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education and required workplace skills are explored. It is noted that industry, academia, and government have identified these gaps and educators recognize the need to reform STEM education to better prepare students for their future careers. The research delves into the necessary skills for STEM disciplines and evaluates whether current frameworks for 21st-century skills and engineering education encompass all important STEM competencies. Using a standardized job-specific database maintained by the United States Department of Labor, the study identifies 18 essential skills, seven categories of knowledge, and 27 work activities deemed important for STEM workers. By comparing the perspectives of both STEM and non-STEM job incumbents, the importance of each skill, knowledge type, and work activity is assessed for both groups. The analysis aims to condense these key areas by categorizing them according to the Katz and Kahn framework from 1978 while also testing for inter-rater reliability. The findings reveal that existing frameworks for 21st-century skills and engineering education do not fully cover all crucial STEM competencies. This raises implications for STEM education programs on how they can bridge the gap between educational curricula and essential workplace competencies. The study provides valuable insights into refining STEM education to align more closely with the demands of today's workforce in order to better prepare students for successful careers in STEM fields.

• - Gaps between STEM education and required workplace skills are identified
• - Industry, academia, and government have recognized these gaps
• - Educators acknowledge the need to reform STEM education for better career preparation
• - Study evaluates necessary skills for STEM disciplines using a job-specific database
• - 18 essential skills, seven knowledge categories, and 27 work activities important for STEM workers are identified
• - Comparison of perspectives between STEM and non-STEM job incumbents is conducted
• - Existing frameworks for 21st-century skills and engineering education do not fully cover all crucial STEM competencies
• - Implications raised for bridging the gap between educational curricula and workplace competencies in STEM programs

Summary- People have noticed differences between what kids learn in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) classes and what they need to know for jobs. - Companies, schools, and the government know about these differences. - Teachers agree that STEM classes should change to help kids get ready for jobs. - A study looked at the skills needed for STEM jobs using a special database of job information. - The study found 18 important skills, seven knowledge categories, and 27 work activities that are key for STEM workers. Definitions- Gaps: Differences or spaces between two things - STEM education: Learning about science, technology, engineering, and math - Workplace skills: Abilities needed to do well in a job - Academia: Schools or places of learning like colleges - Reform: To make changes to improve something

STEM education has been a hot topic in recent years, with many stakeholders recognizing the need to reform traditional approaches in order to better prepare students for their future careers. In particular, there has been growing concern about the gaps between STEM education and required workplace skills. To address this issue, Hyewon Jang conducted a study titled "Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data", which delves into the necessary skills for STEM disciplines and evaluates whether current frameworks for 21st-century skills and engineering education encompass all important competencies. The research begins by acknowledging that industry, academia, and government have all identified gaps between STEM education and workplace demands. This highlights the importance of bridging these gaps in order to ensure that students are equipped with the necessary skills to succeed in their future careers. The study then goes on to explore these essential competencies by analyzing data from a standardized job-specific database maintained by the United States Department of Labor. Through this analysis, Jang identifies 18 essential skills, seven categories of knowledge, and 27 work activities deemed important for STEM workers. These include both technical skills such as programming and problem-solving as well as non-technical skills like communication and teamwork. By comparing the perspectives of both STEM job incumbents and non-STEM job incumbents, Jang is able to assess the importance of each skill, knowledge type, and work activity for both groups. One interesting aspect of this study is its use of the Katz and Kahn framework from 1978 to categorize these key areas. This framework divides organizational roles into three main categories: technical (skills related directly to performing tasks), human (interpersonal or social skills), and conceptual (ability to think abstractly). By applying this framework to their findings, Jang is able to identify which types of competencies are most valued in different types of jobs within the STEM field. The results of this analysis reveal that existing frameworks for 21st-century skills and engineering education do not fully cover all crucial STEM competencies. This raises important implications for STEM education programs on how they can bridge the gap between educational curricula and essential workplace competencies. By understanding which skills, knowledge types, and work activities are most valued by both STEM and non-STEM job incumbents, educators can make more informed decisions about what to prioritize in their curriculum. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into refining STEM education to align more closely with the demands of today's workforce. By identifying key competencies that are currently lacking in traditional approaches to STEM education, Jang's research highlights the need for a shift towards a more holistic approach that encompasses both technical and non-technical skills. This will better prepare students for successful careers in STEM fields and help bridge the gap between academia and industry needs. As we continue to navigate an ever-changing job market, it is crucial that we adapt our educational systems to ensure that students are equipped with the necessary skills for success in their future careers.