A Micro-foundation of Social Capital in Evolving Social Networks

AI-generated keywords: Social capital Evolving social networks Mathematical model Homophily Social gregariousness

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study explores social capital within evolving social networks through a mathematical model.
  • Factors influencing network evolution include homophily, structural opportunism, social gregariousness, and the distribution of individuals in society.
  • Three main types of social capital are identified: bonding capital, popularity capital, and bridging capital.
  • Bonding capital is formed by creating close-knit connections, influenced by homophily.
  • Popularity capital arises from preferential attachment and asymmetries in popularity levels among different groups.
  • Less gregarious or opportunistic individuals in homophilic societies may acquire bridging capital and become central in the network.
  • Bridging capital facilitates connections between different groups within the network for information flow and collaboration.
  • Understanding these dynamics can help individuals strategically build social capital to enhance influence and resource access.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ahmed M. Alaa, Kartik Ahuja, Mihaela van der Schaar

Centrality, homophily, network formation, popularity, preferential attachment, social capital, social networks

Abstract: A social network confers benefits and advantages on individuals (and on groups), the literature refers to these advantages as social capital. This paper presents a micro-founded mathematical model of the evolution of a social network and of the social capital of individuals within the network. The evolution of the network is influenced by the extent to which individuals are homophilic, structurally opportunistic, socially gregarious and by the distribution of types in the society. In the analysis, we identify different kinds of social capital: bonding capital, popularity capital, and bridging capital. Bonding capital is created by forming a circle of connections, homophily increases bonding capital because it makes this circle of connections more homogeneous. Popularity capital leads to preferential attachment: individuals who become popular tend to become more popular because others are more likely to link to them. Homophily creates asymmetries in the levels of popularity attained by different social groups, more gregarious types of agents are more likely to become popular. However, in homophilic societies, individuals who belong to less gregarious, less opportunistic, or major types are likely to be more central in the network and thus acquire a bridging capital.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Nov. 2015

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1511.02429v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study "A Micro-foundation of Social Capital in Evolving Social Networks" by Ahmed M. Alaa, Kartik Ahuja, and Mihaela van der Schaar, the authors delve into the concept of social capital within social networks. They introduce a mathematical model that explores how social networks evolve and how individuals within these networks accrue social capital. The evolution of the network is influenced by factors such as homophily (the tendency for individuals to connect with others who are similar to them), structural opportunism, social gregariousness, and the distribution of different types of individuals in society. The authors identify three main types of social capital: bonding capital, popularity capital, and bridging capital. Bonding capital is formed when individuals create a close-knit circle of connections. Homophily plays a key role in increasing bonding capital by making these connections more homogeneous. Popularity capital arises from preferential attachment. Popular individuals tend to attract more connections because others are drawn to link with them. Homophily also leads to asymmetries in popularity levels among different social groups. More gregarious individuals are more likely to become popular. Interestingly, in homophilic societies where individuals tend to connect with others who are similar to them, those belonging to less gregarious or less opportunistic types may actually become more central in the network and acquire bridging capital. This form of social capital allows for connections between different groups within the network, facilitating information flow and collaboration across diverse segments. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into how social networks evolve and how individuals can strategically build different forms of social capital through their network interactions. By understanding these dynamics, individuals and groups can leverage their position within a network to enhance their influence and access resources effectively.
Created on 06 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.