Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1509.07360v1

This paper explores the use of the W5H framework in enterprise architecture (EA) and proposes an extension to this framework called W6H. The W5H framework is commonly used to describe events by journalists and police investigators, but applying it to EA presents challenges as it is not an event but rather a discipline that structures the business and aligns it with IT systems. The authors aim to assess whether the W5H framework is sufficient for modern EA and investigate the ordering and precedence among viewpoint concerns. To achieve these goals, they employ tools from linguistics and focus on a full set of English language interrogatives to describe viewpoint concerns and their inter-relationships. Through the application of these linguistic tools using pedagogical EA examples, the authors make several key findings. Firstly, they show that adding the seventh interrogative 'which' to the W5H set (W6H) provides additional necessary information for creating holistic EA. Secondly, they discover that linguistically established ordering of the interrogatives defines starting points and determines the order in which viewpoints should be arranged for creating complete EA. Finally, they demonstrate that adopting W6H enables the creation of EA for iterative and agile software development life cycles (SDLCs), such as Scrum. The authors believe that their findings enhance practitioners' ability to create EA using frameworks like Zachman Framework (ZF) while also providing theoreticians with tools to improve other EA frameworks like TOGAF and DoDAF. In conclusion, this paper presents an extension to the existing W5H framework called W6H for describing modern enterprise architecture. The authors propose a specific ordering of viewpoint concerns based on linguistic analysis and demonstrate its applicability in creating holistic EA. Their findings have practical implications for practitioners working with ZF and offer theoretical insights for improving other EA frameworks.

• - The paper explores the use of the W5H framework in enterprise architecture (EA) and proposes an extension called W6H.
• - Applying the W5H framework to EA presents challenges as it is not an event but a discipline that structures business and aligns it with IT systems.
• - The authors aim to assess whether the W5H framework is sufficient for modern EA and investigate the ordering and precedence among viewpoint concerns.
• - They employ tools from linguistics and focus on a full set of English language interrogatives to describe viewpoint concerns and their inter-relationships.
• - Adding the seventh interrogative 'which' to the W5H set (W6H) provides additional necessary information for creating holistic EA.
• - Linguistically established ordering of the interrogatives defines starting points and determines the order in which viewpoints should be arranged for creating complete EA.
• - Adopting W6H enables the creation of EA for iterative and agile software development life cycles (SDLCs), such as Scrum.
• - The findings enhance practitioners' ability to create EA using frameworks like Zachman Framework (ZF).
• - The findings also provide theoreticians with tools to improve other EA frameworks like TOGAF and DoDAF.

The paper talks about a way to organize and align businesses with IT systems called the W5H framework. The authors want to see if this framework is good for modern business and how different viewpoints should be arranged. They use tools from language studies to describe these viewpoints and their relationships. By adding another question word, 'which', they can create a more complete framework called W6H. This helps with creating plans for software development. The findings of this research can help people who work in business and improve other frameworks like Zachman Framework, TOGAF, and DoDAF." Definitions- Enterprise Architecture (EA): A way of organizing and aligning businesses with IT systems. - Framework: A structure or plan that helps organize things. - Viewpoint: A particular way of looking at something or thinking about it. - Linguistics: The study of language and its structure. - Interrogatives: Words used to ask questions, like who, what, when, where, why, how, and which. - Holistic: Considering all parts as a whole rather than separate pieces. - Agile software development life cycles (SDLCs): A flexible approach to creating software that allows for changes throughout the process. - Scrum: An agile framework used in software development projects. - Practitioners: People who work in a specific field or profession. - Theoreticians: People who study theories and ideas in a particular subject area.

Introduction Enterprise architecture (EA) is a discipline that structures the business and aligns it with IT systems. It plays a crucial role in modern organizations, helping them to achieve their goals and objectives efficiently. The W5H framework, commonly used by journalists and police investigators to describe events, has been proposed as a potential tool for describing EA. However, applying this framework to EA presents challenges as it is not an event but rather a complex discipline. In this research paper, the authors aim to assess whether the W5H framework is sufficient for modern EA and investigate the ordering and precedence among viewpoint concerns. To achieve these goals, they employ tools from linguistics and focus on a full set of English language interrogatives to describe viewpoint concerns and their inter-relationships. Overview of W5H Framework The W5H framework consists of five key questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? These questions are used by journalists and investigators to gather information about an event or situation. In terms of EA, these questions can be applied to understand various aspects such as stakeholders, processes, locations, timelines, and motivations. Challenges in Applying W5H Framework to EA While the W5H framework may seem like a suitable approach for describing EA at first glance, there are several challenges that need to be addressed. Firstly, unlike events which have a clear beginning and end point, EA is an ongoing process that evolves over time. This makes it difficult to apply the traditional linear approach of the W5H framework. Secondly, there are multiple viewpoints involved in creating holistic EA - business perspective, information perspective, technology perspective - each with its own set of concerns. These viewpoints are interconnected and cannot be described using just five questions. Introducing W6H Framework To address these challenges in applying the W5H framework to modern EA practices, the authors propose an extension called W6H which includes an additional question - Which? This question focuses on the selection and evaluation of options, which is crucial in creating holistic EA. The authors argue that adding this sixth interrogative to the W5H set provides necessary information for creating complete and effective EA. It allows practitioners to consider different options and make informed decisions based on their specific needs and goals. Linguistic Analysis of Viewpoint Concerns To determine the ordering and precedence among viewpoint concerns, the authors employ tools from linguistics. They analyze a full set of English language interrogatives (Who? What? Where? When? Why? How?) to describe each viewpoint concern and its inter-relationships. Through this analysis, they discover that there is a linguistically established ordering of the interrogatives which defines starting points for describing viewpoints. For example, "who" should be considered first as it involves stakeholders who are essential in any business process. Similarly, "what" should be considered before "how" as it involves understanding what processes or activities need to be performed before determining how they will be executed. Practical Implications for Practitioners The findings of this research have practical implications for practitioners working with frameworks like Zachman Framework (ZF). The proposed W6H framework can enhance their ability to create holistic EA by providing a structured approach to considering all relevant viewpoint concerns. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate how adopting W6H can enable the creation of EA for iterative and agile software development life cycles (SDLCs), such as Scrum. This is particularly relevant in today's fast-paced business environment where organizations need to adapt quickly to changing market conditions. Theoretical Insights for Improving Other EA Frameworks Apart from its practical implications, this research also offers theoretical insights for improving other existing EA frameworks like TOGAF and DoDAF. By incorporating linguistic analysis into these frameworks, it may be possible to define a specific ordering of viewpoints that can lead to more effective and comprehensive EA. Conclusion In conclusion, this research paper presents an extension to the existing W5H framework called W6H for describing modern enterprise architecture. The authors propose a specific ordering of viewpoint concerns based on linguistic analysis and demonstrate its applicability in creating holistic EA. Their findings have practical implications for practitioners working with ZF and offer theoretical insights for improving other EA frameworks. By incorporating linguistic tools, the proposed W6H framework provides a structured approach to creating effective and comprehensive EA that can adapt to changing business needs.