Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data

AI-generated keywords: Retrospective study Adverse events Robotic surgery Device malfunctions Patient safety

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Retrospective study on adverse events in robotic surgery from 2000 to 2013
Analysis of 10,624 reports from U.S. FDA MAUDE database
Findings:
Total of 144 deaths (1.4%)
1,391 patient injuries (13.1%)
8,061 device malfunctions (75.9%)
Average of 83.4 incidents per year since 2007
Lower rates of adverse events in gynecology and urology compared to cardiothoracic and head/neck procedures
Common device malfunctions:
Falling instrument pieces into patients (14.7%)
Electrical arcing (10.5%)
Unintended operation (8.6%)
System errors (5%)
Video/imaging problems (2.6%)
Device malfunctions contribute significantly to adverse events
Suggestions for improvement:
Advancements in design and operation of robotic surgical systems
Addressing device malfunctions and improving safety protocols

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Homa Alemzadeh, Ravishankar K. Iyer, Zbigniew Kalbarczyk, Nancy Leveson, Jaishankar Raman

arXiv: 1507.03518v1 - DOI (cs.RO)

Presented as the J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons in January. See Appendix for more detailed results, discussions, and related work

License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

Abstract: Understanding the causes and patient impacts of surgical adverse events will help improve systems and operational practices to avoid incidents in the future. We analyzed the adverse events data related to robotic systems and instruments used in minimally invasive surgery, reported to the U.S. FDA MAUDE database from January 2000 to December 2013. We determined the number of events reported per procedure and per surgical specialty, the most common types of device malfunctions and their impact on patients, and the causes for catastrophic events such as major complications, patient injuries, and deaths. During the study period, 144 deaths (1.4% of the 10,624 reports), 1,391 patient injuries (13.1%), and 8,061 device malfunctions (75.9%) were reported. The numbers of injury and death events per procedure have stayed relatively constant since 2007 (mean = 83.4, 95% CI, 74.2-92.7). Surgical specialties, for which robots are extensively used, such as gynecology and urology, had lower number of injuries, deaths, and conversions per procedure than more complex surgeries, such as cardiothoracic and head and neck (106.3 vs. 232.9, Risk Ratio = 2.2, 95% CI, 1.9-2.6). Device and instrument malfunctions, such as falling of burnt/broken pieces of instruments into the patient (14.7%), electrical arcing of instruments (10.5%), unintended operation of instruments (8.6%), system errors (5%), and video/imaging problems (2.6%), constituted a major part of the reports. Device malfunctions impacted patients in terms of injuries or procedure interruptions. In 1,104 (10.4%) of the events, the procedure was interrupted to restart the system (3.1%), to convert the procedure to non-robotic techniques (7.3%), or to reschedule it to a later time (2.5%). Adoption of advanced techniques in design and operation of robotic surgical systems may reduce these preventable incidents in the future.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Jul. 2015

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1507.03518v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

A retrospective study examining adverse events in robotic surgery found concerning statistics from data reported to the U.S. FDA MAUDE database between January 2000 and December 2013. The study aimed to understand causes and impacts of surgical incidents to improve systems and practices for future prevention. Over the 14-year period, 10,624 reports were analyzed, revealing a total of 144 deaths (1.4%), 1,391 patient injuries (13.1%), and 8,061 device malfunctions (75.9%). The numbers of injury and death events per procedure remained stable since 2007 with an average of 83.4 incidents per year. Analysis also showed lower rates of adverse events in gynecology and urology procedures compared to more complex surgeries like cardiothoracic and head/neck procedures utilizing robotic technology. Device malfunctions were identified as a significant contributor to adverse events during robotic surgeries with common issues including falling instrument pieces into patients (14.7%), electrical arcing (10.5%), unintended operation (8.6%), system errors (5%), and video/imaging problems (2.6%). These malfunctions often resulted in patient injuries or interruptions in procedures. To address these findings, the study suggested advancements in design and operation of robotic surgical systems could help prevent future incidents by addressing device malfunctions and improving safety protocols within minimally invasive surgeries using robotics technology.

- Retrospective study on adverse events in robotic surgery from 2000 to 2013
- Analysis of 10,624 reports from U.S. FDA MAUDE database
- Findings:
- Total of 144 deaths (1.4%)
- 1,391 patient injuries (13.1%)
- 8,061 device malfunctions (75.9%)
- Average of 83.4 incidents per year since 2007
- Lower rates of adverse events in gynecology and urology compared to cardiothoracic and head/neck procedures
- Common device malfunctions:
- Falling instrument pieces into patients (14.7%)
- Electrical arcing (10.5%)
- Unintended operation (8.6%)
- System errors (5%)
- Video/imaging problems (2.6%)
- Device malfunctions contribute significantly to adverse events
- Suggestions for improvement:
- Advancements in design and operation of robotic surgical systems
- Addressing device malfunctions and improving safety protocols

SummaryA study looked at problems in robot surgeries from 2000 to 2013. They checked 10,624 reports from a database. They found that some people died (1.4%), got hurt (13.1%), or had devices not work well (75.9%). On average, there were about 83 incidents each year since 2007. Some surgeries had more issues than others. Definitions- Retrospective study: Looking back at past events to learn something. - Adverse events: Bad things that happen during a surgery. - Device malfunctions: When the tools used in surgery don't work properly. - Gynecology: Medical care for women's health. - Urology: Medical care for urinary system and male reproductive system. - Cardiothoracic: Related to heart and chest area surgeries. - Head/neck procedures: Surgeries on the head or neck area. - Database: A collection of information stored in a computer system. - Protocols: Rules or guidelines to follow for safety.

Introduction

Robotic surgery has become increasingly popular in recent years, with the promise of improved precision and minimally invasive procedures. However, as with any new technology, there are potential risks and adverse events that must be carefully monitored and addressed. In a retrospective study published in the Journal of Patient Safety, researchers examined data reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) MAUDE database between January 2000 and December 2013 to better understand the causes and impacts of adverse events in robotic surgery.

The Study

The study analyzed a total of 10,624 reports over a period of 14 years, revealing concerning statistics about adverse events during robotic surgeries. These included 144 deaths (1.4%), 1,391 patient injuries (13.1%), and 8,061 device malfunctions (75.9%). The numbers remained relatively stable since 2007 with an average of 83.4 incidents per year. Interestingly, the study also found that certain types of procedures had lower rates of adverse events compared to others when utilizing robotic technology. Gynecology and urology procedures had significantly lower rates compared to more complex surgeries such as cardiothoracic or head/neck procedures.

Device Malfunctions

One major finding from this study was that device malfunctions were identified as a significant contributor to adverse events during robotic surgeries. Common issues included falling instrument pieces into patients (14.7%), electrical arcing (10.5%), unintended operation (8.6%), system errors (5%), and video/imaging problems (2.6%). These malfunctions often resulted in patient injuries or interruptions in procedures.

Implications for Future Prevention

The results of this study have important implications for improving safety protocols within minimally invasive surgeries using robotics technology. The authors suggest advancements in the design and operation of robotic surgical systems could help prevent future incidents by addressing device malfunctions. One potential solution is to implement stricter safety protocols, such as regular maintenance checks and training for surgeons on how to handle device malfunctions. Additionally, improvements in the design of robotic surgical systems could also help reduce the risk of adverse events. For example, better insulation materials could prevent electrical arcing, while improved instrument designs could reduce the likelihood of falling pieces.

Limitations

It's important to note that this study has some limitations. The data analyzed was based on voluntary reports to the FDA MAUDE database, which may not capture all adverse events that occurred during robotic surgeries. Additionally, there may be underreporting or inconsistencies in reporting among different healthcare facilities.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this retrospective study highlights concerning statistics about adverse events during robotic surgeries over a 14-year period. Device malfunctions were identified as a significant contributor to these incidents and improvements in design and operation of robotic surgical systems are suggested as potential solutions for preventing future adverse events. As technology continues to advance and more complex procedures are performed using robotics technology, it is crucial to closely monitor and address any potential risks or issues that may arise.

Created on 01 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.