OpenStreetCab: Exploiting Taxi Mobility Patterns in New York City to Reduce Commuter Costs

AI-generated keywords: Uber taxi mobility New York City sharing economy services data-driven insights

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study titled "OpenStreetCab: Exploiting Taxi Mobility Patterns in New York City to Reduce Commuter Costs" by Vsevolod Salnikov, Renaud Lambiotte, Anastasios Noulas, and Cecilia Mascolo
  • Focus on Uber as a global alternative taxi operator disrupting traditional transportation industry
  • Interest from policy makers, economists, citizens, and scientists in integrating sharing economy services into urban ecosystems
  • Utilization of publicly available dataset on yellow taxi mobility in NYC for comparison with Uber
  • Identification of instances where Uber X is more expensive than traditional yellow taxis for similar journeys
  • Proposal of a new mobile application to compare taxi prices within the city to empower travelers and reduce commuter costs
  • Highlighting how leveraging large datasets can enhance urban services by promoting transparency and optimizing commuter experiences
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Vsevolod Salnikov, Renaud Lambiotte, Anastasios Noulas, Cecilia Mascolo

in NetMob 2015

Abstract: The rise of Uber as the global alternative taxi operator has attracted a lot of interest recently. Aside from the media headlines which discuss the new phenomenon, e.g. on how it has disrupted the traditional transportation industry, policy makers, economists, citizens and scientists have engaged in a discussion that is centred around the means to integrate the new generation of the sharing economy services in urban ecosystems. In this work, we aim to shed new light on the discussion, by taking advantage of a publicly available longitudinal dataset that describes the mobility of yellow taxis in New York City. In addition to movement, this data contains information on the fares paid by the taxi customers for each trip. As a result we are given the opportunity to provide a first head to head comparison between the iconic yellow taxi and its modern competitor, Uber, in one of the world's largest metropolitan centres. We identify situations when Uber X, the cheapest version of the Uber taxi service, tends to be more expensive than yellow taxis for the same journey. We also demonstrate how Uber's economic model effectively takes advantage of well known patterns in human movement. Finally, we take our analysis a step further by proposing a new mobile application that compares taxi prices in the city to facilitate traveller's taxi choices, hoping to ultimately to lead to a reduction of commuter costs. Our study provides a case on how big datasets that become public can improve urban services for consumers by offering the opportunity for transparency in economic sectors that lack up to date regulations.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Mar. 2015

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1503.03021v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study titled "OpenStreetCab: Exploiting Taxi Mobility Patterns in New York City to Reduce Commuter Costs," authors Vsevolod Salnikov, Renaud Lambiotte, Anastasios Noulas, and Cecilia Mascolo delve into the impact of Uber as a global alternative taxi operator. The researchers highlight the widespread interest surrounding Uber's disruptive presence in the traditional transportation industry, prompting discussions among policy makers, economists, citizens, and scientists on integrating sharing economy services into urban ecosystems. Utilizing a publicly available longitudinal dataset detailing yellow taxi mobility in New York City, the study offers a unique opportunity to compare the iconic yellow taxi with its modern competitor, Uber. By analyzing movement patterns and fare information from taxi customers, the researchers identify instances where Uber X – the cheapest version of Uber's service – proves to be more expensive than traditional yellow taxis for similar journeys. Furthermore, they showcase how Uber's economic model effectively capitalizes on well-established human movement patterns. Taking their analysis a step further, the authors propose a new mobile application designed to compare taxi prices within the city. This tool aims to empower travelers by facilitating informed decisions when choosing between different taxi services, ultimately leading to reduced commuter costs. The study serves as a testament to how leveraging large datasets can enhance urban services for consumers by promoting transparency in economic sectors that may lack up-to-date regulations. Overall, "OpenStreetCab" sheds new light on the evolving landscape of urban transportation and underscores the potential benefits of harnessing data-driven insights to optimize commuter experiences and drive efficiency within metropolitan areas.
Created on 24 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.