Threadneedle: An Experimental Tool for the Simulation and Analysis of Fractional Reserve Banking Systems
Authors: Jacky Mallett
Abstract: Threadneedle is a multi-agent simulation framework, based on a full double entry book keeping implementation of the banking system's fundamental transactions. It is designed to serve as an experimental test bed for economic simulations that can explore the banking system's influence on the macro-economy under varying assumptions for its regulatory framework, mix of financial instruments, and activities of borrowers and lenders. Support is provided for Basel Capital and central bank reserve regulatory frameworks, inter-bank lending and correct handling of loan defaults within the bank accounting framework. In this paper we provide an overview of the design of Threadneedle, and the rational for the double entry book keeping approach used in its implementation. We then provide evidence from a series of experiments using the simulation that the macro-economic behaviour of the banking system is in some cases sensitive to double entry book keeping ledger definitions, and in particular that loss provisions can be systemically affecting. We also show that credit and money expansion in Basel regulated systems is now dominated by the Basel capital requirements, rather than the older central bank reserve requirements. This implies that bank profitability is now the main factor in providing new capital to support lending, meaning that lowering interest rates can act to restrict loan supply, rather than increasing borrowing as currently believed. We also show that long term liquidity flows due to interest repayment act in favour of the bank making the loan, and do not provide any long term throttling effect on loan expansion and money expansion as has been claimed by Keynes and others.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.