Replicator Dynamics of of Cancer Stem Cell; Selection in the Presence of Differentiation and Plasticity
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Study focuses on replicator dynamics of cancer stem cells in the presence of differentiation and plasticity
- Stem cells can generate differentiated cells through hierarchical division scheme
- Selection dynamics of mutant cancer stem cells examined considering proliferation hierarchy and non-stem cell populations
- Three-compartment Moran-type model constructed to investigate, consisting of normal stem cells, mutant (cancer) stem cells, and differentiated cells
- Asymmetric differentiation and differentiated cell death rates incorporated into the model to derive replicator dynamics of stem cell frequencies
- Analysis of how factors affect conditions for successful mutant invasion and variations in steady state fraction of population as parameters are altered
- Phenotypic plasticity/dedifferentiation allows progenitor or differentiated cells to transform back into cancer stem cells
- Effective fitness of mutant stem cells determined by proliferation, death rates, and dedifferentiation potential
- Phase diagram created illustrating advantageous and disadvantageous phases of cancer stem cells in terms of proliferation and dedifferentiation potentials
- Previously disadvantageous mutants can dominate normal stem cell populations with high dedifferentiation rates present
- Findings have implications for cancer research, highlighting importance of replication dynamics in studying tumor development and progression.
Authors: Kamran Kaveh, Mohammad Kohandel, Siv Sivaloganathan
Abstract: Stem cells have the potential to produce lineages of non-stem cell populations (differentiated cells) via a ubiquitous hierarchal division scheme. Differentiation of a stem cell into (partially) differentiated cells can happen either symmetrically or asymmetrically. The selection dynamics of a mutant cancer stem cell should be investigated in the light of a stem cell proliferation hierarchy and presence of a non-stem cell population. By constructing a three-compartment Moran-type model composed of normal stem cells, mutant (cancer) stem cells and differentiated cells, we derive the replicator dynamics of stem cell frequencies where asymmetric differentiation and differentiated cell death rates are included in the model. We determine how these new factors change the conditions for a successful mutant invasion and discuss the variation on the steady state fraction of the population as different model parameters are changed. By including the phenotypic plasticity/dedifferentiation, in which a progenitor/differentiated cell can transform back into a cancer stem cell, we show that the effective fitness of mutant stem cells is not only determined by their proliferation and death rates but also according to their dedifferentiation potential. By numerically solving the model we derive the phase diagram of the advantageous and disadvantageous phases of cancer stem cells in the space of proliferation and dedifferentiation potentials. The result shows that at high enough dedifferentiation rates even a previously disadvantageous mutant can take over the population of normal stem cells. This observation has implications in different areas of cancer research including experimental observations that imply metastatic cancer stem cell types might have lower proliferation potential than other stem cell phenotypes while showing much more phenotypic plasticity and can undergo clonal expansion.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.