System Model Semantics of Statecharts
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors present a comprehensive definition of semantics for UML/P Statecharts
- UML/P Statecharts are a variant of Statecharts with restrictions on certain concepts
- Semantics established by transforming full UML/P Statecharts into simplified versions
- Semantics defined denotationally by mapping simplified Statecharts into system model
- Existing Statechart semantics can be mapped into the system model
- Extends authors' previous work on defining semantics for UML class diagrams
- Report spans 51 pages and includes five figures
- Originally published in 2008 by Technische Universität Braunschweig's Carl-Friedrich-Gauss-Fakultät and available in PDF format through arXiv.org
- Contributes to advancing understanding of formalizing and defining semantics for complex modeling languages like UML/P Statecharts
- Proposed system model provides foundation for analyzing and interpreting diagrams within an object-oriented context.
Authors: Maria Victoria Cengarle, Hans Grönninger, Bernhard Rumpe
Abstract: In this report, semantics for Statecharts is defined based on a mathematical model of object systems called "system model". The semantics definition is detailed for UML/P Statecharts, a variant of Statecharts which restricts the use of a few methodologically and semantically difficult concepts. After transforming full UML/P Statecharts to simplified but semantically equivalent Statecharts, the semantics is defined denotationally as a mapping into the system model. It is also sketched how already existing Statechart semantics can be mapped into the system model. This report follows, in which we introduced our approach in detail and defined semantics for UML class diagrams.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.