Derivation of Quantum Theory from Feynman's Rules

AI-generated keywords: Quantum Theory

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Philip Goyal's paper explores Richard Feynman's formulation of quantum theory
  • Feynman's formulation lacks the mathematical structure of the standard von Neumann-Dirac formalism, specifically in regards to unitary evolution
  • Goyal presents a method to reconstruct the finite-dimensional quantum formalism using Feynman's rules and introduces the no-disturbance postulate
  • The no-disturbance postulate states that certain measurements have no impact on subsequent measurement outcomes
  • By incorporating this postulate, Goyal successfully derives both the amplitude rule for composite systems and Dirac's amplitude-action rule based on a single elementary assumption aligned with Feynman's rules
  • Goyal's work expands upon Feynman's formulation by incorporating essential mathematical structures from the von Neumann-Dirac formalism through consistent assumptions.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Philip Goyal

Phys. Rev. A 89, 032120 (2014)
arXiv: 1403.3527v1 - DOI (quant-ph)
14 pages, 9 figures

Abstract: Feynman's formulation of quantum theory is remarkable in its combination of formal simplicity and computational power. However, as a formulation of the abstract structure of quantum theory, it is incomplete as it does not account for most of the fundamental mathematical structure of the standard von Neumann-Dirac formalism such as the unitary evolution of quantum states. In this paper, we show how to reconstruct the entirety of the finite-dimensional quantum formalism starting from Feynman's rules with the aid of a single new physical postulate, the no-disturbance postulate. This postulate states that a particular class of measurements have no effect on the outcome probabilities of subsequent measurements performed. We also show how it is possible to derive both the amplitude rule for composite systems of distinguishable subsystems and Dirac's amplitude-action rule, each from a single elementary and natural assumption, by making use of the fact that these assumptions must be consistent with Feynman's rules.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Mar. 2014

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1403.3527v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , Philip Goyal's paper "Derivation of Quantum Theory from Feynman's Rules" explores Richard Feynman's formulation of quantum theory. While known for its simplicity and computational power, this formulation lacks the fundamental mathematical structure of the standard von Neumann-Dirac formalism, specifically in regards to unitary evolution. To address this limitation, Goyal presents a method to reconstruct the finite-dimensional quantum formalism using Feynman's rules and introduces the no-disturbance postulate. This postulate states that certain measurements have no impact on subsequent measurement outcomes. By incorporating this postulate, Goyal successfully derives both the amplitude rule for composite systems and Dirac's amplitude-action rule based on a single elementary assumption aligned with Feynman's rules. Overall, Goyal's work expands upon Feynman's formulation by incorporating essential mathematical structures from the von Neumann-Dirac formalism through consistent assumptions.
Created on 15 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.