New Quantitative Deformation Lemma and New Mountain Pass Theorem

AI-generated keywords: Quantitative Deformation Lemma Mountain Pass Theorem Critical Points Supinf Critical Value Infmax Critical Value

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors present a new quantitative deformation lemma for discovering critical points
  • Focus on two types of critical values: supinf critical value $c_1$ and infmax critical value $c_2$
  • New lemma identifies a new critical point at $x=\varphi^{-1}(c_1)$ for supinf critical value $c_1$
  • Technique enables identification of two new critical points at $x = 0$ (valley point) and $x = e$ (peak point) for infmax critical value $c_2
  • Comparison to Willem's variant of mountain pass theorem shows $\varphi(e)=c_2$, providing a more precise characterization
  • Paper enhances ability to identify previously unknown critical points
  • Potential applications in optimization and mathematical analysis
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Liang Ding, Fode Zhang, Shiqing Zhang

arXiv: 1402.4602v2 - DOI (math.FA)
License: CC BY 3.0

Abstract: In this paper, we obtain a new quantitative deformation Lemma so that we can obtain more critical points, especially for supinf critical value $c_1$, $x=\varphi^{-1}(c_1)$ is a new critical point. For $infmax$ critical value $c_2$, we can obtain two new critical points $x = 0$ (valley point) and $x = e$(peak point) ,comparing with Willem's variant of the mountain pass theorem of Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz,in which $\varphi(e)\leq\varphi(0)<c_2$, but in our new mountain pass theorem, $ \varphi(e)=c_2$.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Feb. 2014

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1402.4602v2

In the paper titled "New Quantitative Deformation Lemma and New Mountain Pass Theorem," authors Liang Ding, Fode Zhang, and Shiqing Zhang present a novel quantitative deformation lemma that allows for the discovery of more critical points. Specifically, the authors focus on two types of critical values: supinf critical value $c_1$ and infmax critical value $c_2$. For the supinf critical value $c_1$, the authors demonstrate that by using their new quantitative deformation lemma, they can identify a new critical point at $x=\varphi^{-1}(c_1)$. This finding suggests that their approach is capable of uncovering additional critical points compared to previous methods. Moving on to the infmax critical value $c_2$, the authors show that their technique enables them to identify not just one but two new critical points. These points are located at $x = 0$ (valley point) and $x = e$ (peak point). This result is particularly noteworthy when compared to Willem's variant of the mountain pass theorem proposed by Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz. In Willem's variant, it was found that $\varphi(e)\leq\varphi(0)<c_2$. However, in this new mountain pass theorem presented by Ding, Zhang, and Zhang, it is shown that $\varphi(e)=c_2$. This implies that their approach yields a more precise characterization of the relationship between $\varphi(e)$ and $\varphi(0)$. Overall, this paper introduces a novel quantitative deformation lemma which enhances our ability to identify previously unknown critical points. By applying this lemma to both supinf and infmax critical values, the authors demonstrate its effectiveness in uncovering these points. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of mountain pass theorems and offer potential applications in various fields related to optimization and mathematical analysis.
Created on 12 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.