The adoption and challenges of electronic voting technologies within the South African context
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Electronic voting systems have gained traction globally as a solution to challenges with traditional paper-based voting methods
- Countries like Brazil and India have successfully implemented electronic voting systems, demonstrating benefits in efficiency and integrity of electoral processes
- South Africa is exploring the adoption of electronic voting technologies to enhance its electoral system
- A study by Mourine Achieng and Ephias Ruhode focuses on the adoption and challenges of e-voting within the South African context
- Manual voting processes are seen as cumbersome, insecure, and time-consuming, prompting a need for more efficient alternatives like e-voting
- E-voting could streamline the electoral process, reduce costs associated with physical ballot papers, address distribution challenges, and improve confidence in the process
- Factors such as relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity influence intentions of South African voters and Electoral Management Bodies (IEC) to adopt e-voting technologies
- The study conducted online questionnaires with Cape Town voters and interviews with IEC officials using thematic analysis and diffusion of innovations theory as a framework
- Limitations include focus on voters in Cape Town with internet access; proactive addressing of issues can lead to a more efficient and transparent electoral process through e-voting solutions
Authors: Mourine Achieng, Ephias Ruhode
Abstract: Literature has shown that countries such as Brazil and India have successfully implemented electronic voting systems and other countries are at various piloting stages to address many challenges associated with manual paper based system such ascosts of physical ballot paper and other overheads, electoral delays, distribution of electoral materials, and general lack of confidence in the electoral process. It is in this context that this study explores how South African can leverage the opportunities that e-voting presents. Manual voting is often tedious, non-secure, and time-consuming, which leads us to think about using electronic facilities to make the process more efficient. This study proposes that the adoption of electronic voting technologies could perhaps mitigate some of these issues and challengesin the process improving the electoral process. The study used an on-line questionnaire which was administered to a broader group of voters and an in-depth semi-structured interview with the Independent Electoral Commission officials. The analysis is based on thematic analysis and diffusion of innovations theory is adopted as a theoretical lens of analysis. The findings reveal that relative advantage, compatibility and complexity would determine the intentions of South African voters and the Electoral Management Bodies (IEC) to adopt e-voting technologies. Moreover, the findings also reveal several other factorsthat could influence the adoption process. The study is limited to only voters in Cape Town and these voters were expected to have some access to the internet. The sample size limits the generalizability of the findings of this study.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.