How fast can we make interpreted Python?

AI-generated keywords: Python dynamic language libraries performance gap Falcon

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Python is a widely used dynamic language with extensive libraries and extension modules
  • Python is used for web development with Django and numerical analysis using NumPy
  • Python's performance falls short compared to more modern languages like Lua and JavaScript
  • Researchers Russell Power and Alex Rubinsteyn designed Falcon to address Python's performance issues while retaining access to existing extension libraries
  • Falcon is a high-performance bytecode interpreter fully compatible with the standard CPython interpreter
  • Falcon aims to accelerate the execution of Python bytecode by incorporating optimizations and introducing new techniques
  • Falcon was found to be an average of 25% faster than the standard Python interpreter across most benchmarks, with some cases showing a speed improvement of about 2.5 times faster than traditional Python execution
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Russell Power, Alex Rubinsteyn

Tech Report

Abstract: Python is a popular dynamic language with a large part of its appeal coming from powerful libraries and extension modules. These augment the language and make it a productive environment for a wide variety of tasks, ranging from web development (Django) to numerical analysis (NumPy). Unfortunately, Python's performance is quite poor when compared to modern implementations of languages such as Lua and JavaScript. Why does Python lag so far behind these other languages? As we show, the very same API and extension libraries that make Python a powerful language also make it very difficult to efficiently execute. Given that we want to retain access to the great extension libraries that already exist for Python, how fast can we make it? To evaluate this, we designed and implemented Falcon, a high-performance bytecode interpreter fully compatible with the standard CPython interpreter. Falcon applies a number of well known optimizations and introduces several new techniques to speed up execution of Python bytecode. In our evaluation, we found Falcon an average of 25% faster than the standard Python interpreter on most benchmarks and in some cases about 2.5X faster.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Jun. 2013

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1306.6047v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Python is a widely used dynamic language known for its extensive libraries and extension modules that enhance its functionality for various tasks. These include web development with Django and numerical analysis using NumPy. However, when compared to more modern languages like Lua and JavaScript, Python's performance falls short. This can be attributed to the complexity introduced by the same API and extension libraries that make Python versatile and powerful. In an effort to address this issue while retaining access to existing extension libraries, researchers Russell Power and Alex Rubinsteyn designed and implemented Falcon. It is a high-performance bytecode interpreter that remains fully compatible with the standard CPython interpreter. By incorporating well-known optimizations and introducing new techniques, Falcon aims to accelerate the execution of Python bytecode. In their evaluation, Power and Rubinsteyn found Falcon to be an average of 25% faster than the standard Python interpreter across most benchmarks. In some cases, it even demonstrated a remarkable speed improvement of about 2.5 times faster than traditional Python execution. This research sheds light on the potential for enhancing Python's performance without sacrificing access to its rich ecosystem of libraries and extensions.
Created on 13 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.