The stochastic background: scaling laws and time to detection for pulsar timing arrays

AI-generated keywords: Pulsar Timing Arrays Scaling Laws Signal-to-Noise Ratio Stochastic Background Detection

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Siemens et al. investigate scaling laws and time to detection for pulsar timing arrays in relation to the stochastic background
  • They challenge the commonly assumed power-law increase of signal-to-noise ratio as a function of observation time (T)
  • After a certain amount of time, pulsar timing arrays enter a new regime where signal-to-noise ratio scales only as the square root of T
  • Pulsar timing data quality and cadence become relatively unimportant in this regime due to gravitational wave domination at lowest frequencies
  • Pulsar timing arrays transition into this regime more quickly than expected, with T=10 years and typical stochastic background amplitudes
  • Increasing the number of pulsars in an array is proposed as the most effective strategy for enhancing detectability in this new regime
  • Realistic simulations using NANOGrav pulsar timing array data support their claims
  • Detection of the stochastic background is possible within a decade and could potentially occur as early as 2016
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xavier Siemens, Justin Ellis, Fredrick Jenet, Joseph D. Romano

arXiv: 1305.3196v1 - DOI (astro-ph.IM)
Submitted to Classical and Quantum Gravity for Focus Issue on Pulsar Timing Arrays. 15 pages, 5 figures

Abstract: We derive scaling laws for the signal-to-noise ratio of the optimal cross-correlation statistic, and show that the large power-law increase of the signal-to-noise ratio as a function of the the observation time $T$ that is usually assumed holds only at early times. After enough time has elapsed, pulsar timing arrays enter a new regime where the signal to noise only scales as $\sqrt{T}$. In addition, in this regime the quality of the pulsar timing data and the cadence become relatively un-important. This occurs because the lowest frequencies of the pulsar timing residuals become gravitational-wave dominated. Pulsar timing arrays enter this regime more quickly than one might naively suspect. For T=10 yr observations and typical stochastic background amplitudes, pulsars with residual RMSs of less than about $1\,\mu$s are already in that regime. The best strategy to increase the detectability of the background in this regime is to increase the number of pulsars in the array. We also perform realistic simulations of the NANOGrav pulsar timing array, which through an aggressive pulsar survey campaign adds new millisecond pulsars regularly to its array, and show that a detection is possible within a decade, and could occur as early as 2016.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 May. 2013

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1305.3196v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study, Siemens et al. investigate the scaling laws and time to detection for pulsar timing arrays in relation to the stochastic background. They derive scaling laws for the signal-to-noise ratio of the optimal cross-correlation statistic and challenge the commonly assumed power-law increase of the signal-to-noise ratio as a function of observation time (T). Their findings reveal that this power-law increase only holds true at early times. After a certain amount of time has elapsed, pulsar timing arrays enter a new regime where the signal-to-noise ratio scales only as the square root of T. Furthermore, they demonstrate that in this regime, the quality of pulsar timing data and cadence become relatively unimportant due to gravitational wave domination at the lowest frequencies of pulsar timing residuals. Interestingly, pulsar timing arrays transition into this regime more quickly than initially expected. For observations with T=10 years and typical stochastic background amplitudes, pulsars with residual root mean square values below approximately 1 microsecond are already operating within this regime. To enhance detectability in this new regime, Siemens et al. propose increasing the number of pulsars in an array as the most effective strategy. To support their claims, they conduct realistic simulations using NANOGrav (North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves) pulsar timing array data. Through an aggressive survey campaign that regularly adds new millisecond pulsars to its array, they demonstrate that detection of the stochastic background is possible within a decade and could potentially occur as early as 2016. Overall, their study provides valuable insights into understanding the behavior and detectability of gravitational waves using pulsar timing arrays; it highlights important considerations regarding observation time, signal-to-noise ratio scaling laws and strategies for maximizing detection capabilities in different regimes.
Created on 08 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.