Reply to Hunter and Brown Discussion of Is there any support in the long term tide gauge data to the claims that parts of Sydney will be swamped by rising sea levels?, Coastal Engineering 2012;64:161-167, Coastal Engineering 2013;75:1-3

Authors: Alberto Boretti

arXiv: 1303.5519v1 - DOI (physics.ao-ph)
reply to a comment to one original research paper of mine published on Coastal Engineering

Abstract: Hunter and Brown try to demonstrate in their discussion of the long term tide gauge data published in my previous paper that the sea levels are accelerating when they are not. The sea levels are mostly oscillating and certainly not positively accelerating at the present time. As shown in the graphs proposed here after, having an understanding of the oscillatory behaviour of sea levels and by using linear and parabolic fittings but not being selective in the time window to consider, the tide gauge of Sydney exhibits clear multi decadal and inter-annual periodicities but no detectable component of acceleration, similarly to the many others tide gauges of the Pacific or the rest of the world having enough quality and length. If all the long term tide gauges do not exhibit any present accelerating pattern, possibly some simulations and reconstructions may be wrong similarly to the selective assessment of the sea level rise by fitting only the few years of data useful to support the positive acceleration claim.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Mar. 2013

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1303.5519v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 02 May. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Some bits of the article are not summarized yet, you can re-run the summarizing process by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.