On applications of conservation laws in pharmacokinetics

AI-generated keywords: Conservation laws

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors S. Piekarski and M. Rewekant address criticisms raised by A. Rescigno against the standard formulation of pharmacokinetics
  • Inconsistencies in pharmacokinetics can be eliminated by deriving "pharmacokinetic parameters" from conservation laws
  • The authors present a simple system of conservation laws for extra-vascular administration of a drug
  • A. Rescigno's criticism prompts researchers to explore alternative approaches for consistency in pharmacokinetics
  • Deriving pharmacokinetic parameters from conservation laws is one such approach
  • Piekarski and Rewekant provide a framework for deriving pharmacokinetic parameters using conservation laws for extra-vascular drug administration
  • Preliminary discussion on the implications and potential benefits of using conservation laws as a basis for deriving pharmacokinetic parameters
  • The paper offers valuable insights into addressing criticisms against traditional pharmacokinetic formulations through the application of conservation laws
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: S. Piekarski, M. Rewekant

arXiv: 1208.3847v1 - DOI (q-bio.TO)
6 pages

Abstract: There has been certain criticism raised by A. Rescigno [2,8,9,12-15] against the standard formulation of pharmacokinetics. In 2011 it has been suggested that inconsistencies in pharmacokinetics should be eliminated after deriving "pharmacokinetic parameters" from conservation laws [3]. In the following text a simple system of conservation laws for extra - vascular administration of a drug is explicitly given and preliminary discussion concerning this issue is included.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Aug. 2012

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1208.3847v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "On applications of conservation laws in pharmacokinetics," authors S. Piekarski and M. Rewekant address certain criticisms raised by A. Rescigno against the standard formulation of pharmacokinetics. In 2011, it was suggested that inconsistencies in pharmacokinetics could be eliminated by deriving "pharmacokinetic parameters" from conservation laws. Building upon this idea, the authors present a simple system of conservation laws for extra-vascular administration of a drug. The paper begins by outlining the criticism raised by A. Rescigno regarding the standard formulation of pharmacokinetics and how this has prompted researchers to explore alternative approaches to ensure consistency within the field. One such approach involves deriving pharmacokinetic parameters from conservation laws, which Piekarski and Rewekant aim to provide a framework for through their proposed system of conservation laws specifically designed for extra-vascular administration of drugs. They also include a preliminary discussion on this issue, exploring the implications and potential benefits of using conservation laws as a basis for deriving pharmacokinetic parameters. Overall, this paper offers valuable insights into addressing criticisms against traditional pharmacokinetic formulations through the application of conservation laws and provides a foundation for future research in refining and enhancing our understanding of drug administration and its effects on patients' bodies.
Created on 30 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.