Colorectal cancers differ in respect of PARP-1 protein expression

Authors: Violetta Sulzyc-Bielicka, Pawel Domagala, Jolanta Hybiak, Anna Majewicz-Broda, Krzysztof Safranow, Wenancjusz Domagala

Polish Journal of Pathology 2012; 2: 87-92
arXiv: 1207.5956v1 - DOI (q-bio.SC)

Abstract: Recent findings raise the possibility of PARP inhibitor therapy in colorectal cancers(CRCs). However, the extent of PARP-1 protein expression in clinical specimens of CRC is not known. Using immunohistochemistry we assessed PARP-1 protein expression in tissue microarrays of 151 CRCs and its association with the patient's age, sex, Astler-Coller stage, grade and site of the tumor. High PARP nuclear immunoreactivity was found in 68.2% (103/151) of all cases. In turn, 31.8% (48/151)of tumors showed low PARP expression, including 9 (6%) PARP-1 negative CRCs. There was a significant association of PARP-1 expression with the site of CRC and Astler-Coller stage. A high PARP expression was noted in 79.1% of colon vs. 53.9% of rectal tumors (p = 0.001). The mean PARP-1 score was 1.27 times higher in colon vs. rectal cancers (p = 0.009) and it was higher in stage B2 vs. stage C of CRCs (p = 0.018). In conclusion, the level of PARP-1 protein nuclear expression is associated with the tumor site and heterogeneous across clinical specimens of CRC, with the majority of CRCs expressing a high level but minority - low or no PARP-1 expression. These findings may have a clinical significance because the assessment of PARP-1 expression in tumor samples may improve selection of patients with CRC for PARP inhibitor therapy.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Jul. 2012

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1207.5956v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 10 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Some bits of the article are not summarized yet, you can re-run the summarizing process by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.