The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

AI-generated keywords: Anti-k_t algorithm sequential recombination jet clustering particle physics analysis infrared and collinear safety

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper explores the properties of the "anti-k_t" jet clustering algorithm
  • The algorithm uses a negative power in the energy scale distance measure
  • It behaves similarly to an idealized cone algorithm with equal active and passive areas for jets with soft fragmentation forming conical shapes
  • Unique characteristics include zero area anomalous dimensions, non-global logarithms resembling those of a rigid boundary, and a universal Milan factor
  • The anti-k_t algorithm could potentially replace the iterative cone algorithm due to its fast performance and enhanced infrared and collinear safety
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Matteo Cacciari, Gavin P. Salam, Gregory Soyez

12 pages, 5 figures

Abstract: The k_t and Cambridge/Aachen inclusive jet finding algorithms for hadron-hadron collisions can be seen as belonging to a broader class of sequential recombination jet algorithms, parametrised by the power of the energy scale in the distance measure. We examine some properties of a new member of this class, for which the power is negative. This ``anti-k_t'' algorithm essentially behaves like an idealised cone algorithm, in that jets with only soft fragmentation are conical, active and passive areas are equal, the area anomalous dimensions are zero, the non-global logarithms are those of a rigid boundary and the Milan factor is universal. None of these properties hold for existing sequential recombination algorithms, nor for cone algorithms with split--merge steps, such as SISCone. They are however the identifying characteristics of the collinear unsafe plain ``iterative cone'' algorithm, for which the anti-k_t algorithm provides a natural, fast, infrared and collinear safe replacement.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Feb. 2008

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 0802.1189v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper "The Anti-k_t Jet Clustering Algorithm" by Matteo Cacciari, Gavin P. Salam, and Gregory Soyez explores the properties of a new member in the class of sequential recombination jet algorithms. This algorithm, known as the "anti-k_t" algorithm, utilizes a negative power in the energy scale distance measure. The study reveals that this algorithm exhibits behavior similar to an idealized cone algorithm with equal active and passive areas for jets with soft fragmentation forming conical shapes. Additionally, it demonstrates unique characteristics not found in existing algorithms like SISCone or cone algorithms with split-merge steps. These include zero area anomalous dimensions, non-global logarithms resembling those of a rigid boundary, and a universal Milan factor. Interestingly, these properties align closely with those of the collinear unsafe plain "iterative cone" algorithm. The findings suggest that the anti-k_t algorithm could serve as a natural and efficient replacement for the iterative cone algorithm due to its fast performance and enhanced infrared and collinear safety. Overall, this research sheds light on a novel approach to jet clustering in hadron-hadron collisions and offers insights into potential advancements in particle physics analysis techniques.
Created on 05 Apr. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.